Scan the QR code using the  NZ COVID Tracer app when you enter campus.

Further Reading

The following references provide further information on the role and value of scholarly peer review of teaching in university and higher education environments.

Chickering, A., & Gamson, Z. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, 39 (7), 3-7.

Gordon, G., & Owen, C. (2007). Cultures of quality enhancement: A short review of the literature for higher education policy makers and practitioners. Enhancement Themes: Scotland.

Harris, K-L., Farrell, K., Bell, M., Devlin, M., & James, R. (2008). Peer review of teaching in Australian higher education: A handbook to support institutions in developing and embedding effective policies and practices. Centre for the Study of Higher Education. Australian Learning and Teaching Council.

McKenzie, J., Pelliccione, L., & Parker, N. (2009). What makes blended learning effective? An interactive session of peer review. Paper presented at ASCILITE Conference, Auckland, December.

McKenzie, J., Pelliccione, L., & Parker, N. (2008). Developing peer review of teaching in blended learning environments: Frameworks and challenges. Paper presented at ASCILITE Conference, Melbourne, December.

Quality Matters. (2008). Inter-institutional quality assurance in online learning: Quality matters rubric for online and hybrid courses (2008-2010 edition). Pasadena, MD.

Toth, K.E., & McKey, C.A. (2010). Identifying the potential organizational impact if an educational peer review program. International Journal for Academic Development, 15 (1), 73-83.

Wood, D., & Friedel, M. (2009). Peer review of online learning and teaching: Harnessing collective intelligence to address emerging challenges. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25 (1), 60-79.

Contact us Mon - Fri 8:30am to 4:30pm 0800 MASSEY (+64 6 350 5701) TXT 5222 Web chat Staff Alumni News Māori @ Massey